#20

New Balance Kawhi IV 🛒 Find on Amazon → 🛒 eBay →
🔀 Merged from 1 variants
New Balance Kawhi 3

Name: New Balance Kawhi IV
Rating: 2.3 (3 reviews)

📊 40% AI Agreement🏆 Rank #20🤖 3 of 19 AIs

#4×1#6×1#8×1

🏆 2.3 SlopSort Rating

🤖 The AI Verdict

New Balance Kawhi IV was ranked by 3 out of 19 AI models consulted. It achieved a consensus rank of #20 with a 40% AI agreement score. The average position given by the AIs was #6.0.

AI Agreement Meter

40%

Low Agreement

3 of 19 AI models included this

0% 50% 100%

Where Each AI Ranked This

DeepSeek R1

Gemini 3 Pro

Mini Max M2.1

Range: #4 – #8 Wide spread — AIs disagree significantly

AI Rankings Breakdown

View Full AI Breakdown (3 models)

Points = base position score × AI weight. Higher-weighted AIs contribute more points per position.

AI Model	Rank Given	Weighted Points
DeepSeek R1(1.52x)	#4	11 pts
Gemini 3 Pro(1.59x)	#6	8 pts
Mini Max M2.1(1.53x)	#8	5 pts

Reason 3 AIs reported

Gemini 3 Pro: "Built for a player with a heavy frame and flat feet (Kawhi Leonard), prioritizing stiffness over flexibility."

Mini Max M2.1: "Designed with wide last and excellent torsional support Biomechanical Reason: Wide base accommodates flat feet, firm midfoot shank prevents arch collapse, deep heel cup secures rearfoot Retail Status: Current generation (2023) Notes: Heavy shoe but excellent for stability needs"

DeepSeek R1: "Anatomical design specifically for low-arch athletes"

Biomechanical Reason: 2 AIs reported

Gemini 3 Pro: "Incorporates the Energy Arc carbon fiber plate sandwiched within the midsole, offering maximum torsional rigidity and energy return."

DeepSeek R1: "Dual-density FuelCell midsole with carbon fiber plate; extended lateral flange"

Retail Status: 2 AIs reported

Gemini 3 Pro: "Current Performance Model"

DeepSeek R1: "Current-gen (released 2025)"

Notes: 2 AIs reported

Gemini 3 Pro: "Very stiff break-in period required; do not expect immediate comfort, but the long-term support is superior."

DeepSeek R1: "Multiple width options (including 2E); runs true to size"

How Close Was It?

Gap to #19 above